ExploreHotelWorld
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

‘The View’ co-host lauds Hunter Biden as ‘riveting’ after podcast sit-down, calls him ‘biggest troll’

Published July 18, 2026 · Updated July 18, 2026 · By Matthew Davis - explorehotelworld.com

Navarro Highlights Hunter Biden's Podcast Appearance, Questions Media Double Standards

The View co host lauds Hunter - During a recent episode of "Behind the Table," the ABC program's podcast series, co-host Ana Navarro offered enthusiastic praise for Hunter Biden following their extensive conversation. The 90-minute sit-down prompted Navarro to characterize her guest as both "riveting" and "the biggest troll" she has encountered in recent years. Her comments came as she previewed the interview for listeners, emphasizing how the scrutiny directed at Hunter's financial dealings with Burisma seemed disproportionate when measured against the Trump family's own earnings while Donald Trump served as president during his second term.

Navarro articulated her perspective on what she considers unfair treatment, noting that Hunter was "dragged through the coals" and summoned to a congressional hearing over income from his Ukrainian business venture. She contrasted this with the billions accumulated by the Trump family throughout the presidency, calling it a clear example of what she termed "double standards." These observations were part of a broader discussion that took place while Navarro was recording an episode for her own podcast, "Bleep! with Ana Navarro."

On Social Media Presence and Humor

One factor that drew Navarro to feature Hunter on her show was his evolving reputation on social media platforms. She explained that she had been following his online activity and noticed his transformation into what she described as "the biggest troll," though she acknowledged that he approaches this role with a sense of humor. This characterization became particularly relevant when Navarro referenced a memorable exchange that occurred on Hunter Biden's X account.

And he's like, 'No, I would have never forgotten my coke,'

This quip came in response to someone who held Hunter responsible for cocaine that was discovered at the White House in July 2023. The incident eventually led the Secret Service to close its investigation without naming a suspect, though the FBI later reopened the matter in 2025. When Fox News Digital contacted both the FBI and the White House regarding this development, no immediate response was received.

Business Connections and Financial Scrutiny

The Burisma relationship represents a significant chapter in Hunter Biden's public life. According to documentation from the House Oversight Committee, both Hunter Biden and his business associate Devon Archer received annual payments of $1 million each after joining the company's board in 2014. This timing coincided with a period when his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, played a leading role in shaping United States policy toward Ukraine during the Obama administration.

Further examination of Hunter's financial activities revealed additional layers of scrutiny. In February 2024, he participated in a closed-door deposition before the House during the Republican-led impeachment inquiry concerning his father. Although the full House ultimately did not vote on any articles of impeachment, the proceedings highlighted ongoing questions about potential conflicts of interest.

Art Sales and Verification Process

Navarro also addressed criticisms surrounding Hunter Biden's artwork sales, defending the transparency of the process. She noted that while his father occupied the Oval Office, Hunter did not generate income from his father's position but rather from his paintings. Each piece sold underwent a vetting procedure, and Navarro emphasized that Hunter had been creating art throughout his entire life before these transactions came under public examination.

And while his father was president, he didn't make any money. He made money off his paintings… every painting he sold had to go through vetting, and he had been painting his entire life,

Testimony from Georges Bergès, Hunter's former gallerist, provided additional context. Bergès stated that a buyer-anonymity agreement did not become effective until September 2021, and that Hunter was aware of approximately 70 percent of his purchasers. According to the Washington Post, ten buyers contributed $1.5 million for his artwork, with Hunter receiving $900,000 of that total.

Comparative Financial Analysis

The financial comparison between the Biden and Trump families extended beyond Burisma payments. Reuters published an estimate in June suggesting that Donald Trump and his sons had accumulated at least $2.3 billion through their primary cryptocurrency ventures since Trump's return to the White House. Trump himself acknowledged this month that he does not personally manage his financial affairs.

The White House responded firmly to Navarro's comparisons. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, told Fox News Digital that President Trump's children operate as "extremely successful business leaders in their own right running multi-billion-dollar corporations." He contrasted this with his characterization of Hunter Biden, stating: "Hunter Biden smoked crack, banged hookers, and sold ugly paintings for hundreds of thousands of dollars. No one cares what he has to say."

The Interview Experience

Navarro concluded her remarks by describing the interview as compelling from beginning to end. She mentioned that their conversation extended beyond an hour and a half, though she noted an unfortunate scheduling conflict: the interview was arranged at precisely the same time as the Argentina versus England World Cup match. Despite this timing challenge, Navarro remained enthusiastic about the opportunity to engage with Hunter Biden, whose social media presence and business history had made him a subject of considerable public interest.

As media coverage continues to evolve, Navarro's assessment offers one perspective on how Hunter Biden is perceived in contemporary discourse—simultaneously a figure of ridicule and a subject of genuine engagement, caught between criticism and recognition of his resilience in the public eye.